By All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) chief Asaduddin Owaisi has launched a sharp attack on the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), accusing the ruling party of displaying double standards by permitting the India-Pakistan cricket match to proceed despite a recent terror attack. Speaking at a public rally, Mr. Owaisi questioned the government’s priorities, patriotism, and approach to national security, stating that emotions of the people cannot be ignored in the shadow of violence.
The Controversy Over Cricket Amid Terror
The India-Pakistan cricket rivalry is one of the most intense sporting spectacles in the world, attracting millions of viewers. However, in the aftermath of a terror attack on Indian soil, the decision to allow the match to go ahead has triggered a political storm.
Owaisi said that the BJP, which often speaks about nationalism and patriotism, must explain why it permitted sporting ties with Pakistan at such a sensitive time. According to him, playing cricket against Pakistan so soon after an attack on Indian soldiers or civilians sends the wrong signal to the public and to the international community.
Nationalism Versus Practicality
Mr. Owaisi reminded the crowd that the BJP has repeatedly questioned the patriotism of opposition parties whenever they have criticized the government’s policies. He asked, “If questioning the government is anti-national, then what do you call organizing a cricket match with a country responsible for sponsoring terror against India?”
This statement drew strong reactions, as he directly challenged the BJP’s nationalist narrative. He said that true patriotism lies in standing firmly with the people during times of grief and sending a clear message to Pakistan, not in conducting business as usual.
Emotional Impact on Citizens
The AIMIM president stressed that the government should not underestimate the emotional wounds caused by terrorist incidents. Families of martyrs and citizens at large feel betrayed when cultural or sporting ties continue without pause.
He argued that cricket, though a sport, carries symbolic weight in Indo-Pak relations. By allowing the match to take place, the government is prioritizing entertainment and economic interests over the sentiments of its citizens.
Owaisi’s Larger Political Message
Political analysts suggest that Owaisi’s remarks go beyond cricket. His speech highlights what he sees as hypocrisy in the BJP’s approach to nationalism. According to him, the ruling party uses patriotism as a tool against its critics but fails to apply the same yardstick to its own actions.
He also pointed out that while the BJP accuses others of being “soft on terrorism,” the decision to maintain sporting relations with Pakistan after a terror strike contradicts its tough stance on national security.
Government’s Possible Stand
While Owaisi has criticized the government, the BJP leadership has argued in the past that sports should be kept separate from politics. They often stress that cricket is a people-to-people bridge and should not be entirely cut off even during strained relations.
However, critics like Owaisi argue that such reasoning does not hold ground when the nation is mourning the loss of lives due to terrorism. He asked whether the same logic would apply if the families of martyrs were consulted.
Public Reaction and Debate
The issue has sparked intense debate across social media and television channels. Supporters of Owaisi say that he is voicing the genuine concerns of citizens, while critics accuse him of politicizing cricket and seeking headlines.
Some citizens believe that banning cricket with Pakistan would send a strong diplomatic signal, while others argue that sport should remain apolitical. Yet, Owaisi insists that timing matters, and in moments of national grief, symbolic gestures are powerful.
Call for Accountability
Mr. Owaisi concluded his remarks by demanding that the BJP clarify its national security policy and define where it draws the line between engagement and boycott. He said that if cricket with Pakistan is acceptable after a terror attack, then the BJP should stop questioning the patriotism of others who take different stands on national issues.
He urged citizens to hold the government accountable, reminding them that true patriotism is measured by actions, not by slogans.
Conclusion
Asaduddin Owaisi’s criticism of the BJP over the India-Pakistan cricket match has reignited debates on nationalism, priorities, and the role of sports in diplomacy. His remarks underline the tension between emotional sentiments after terror attacks and the government’s decisions in maintaining international sporting relations.
While the controversy continues, it highlights a recurring question in Indian politics: Should cricket between India and Pakistan continue in the aftermath of violence, or should it be suspended as a matter of national respect? Owaisi’s sharp words ensure that this debate will remain at the center of political discourse for some time to come.
Do Follow Us Instagram
