Trending News Guru

CEC Has ‘Blood on His Hands’, Says TMC as Party Alleges 40 SIR-Related Deaths in West Bengal

CEC Has ‘Blood on His Hands’, Says TMC as Party Alleges 40 SIR-Related Deaths in West Bengal

The political temperature in West Bengal has risen sharply after the Trinamool Congress (TMC) launched a scathing attack on the Election Commission of India (ECI), alleging that 40 people have died due to incidents linked to the Statewide Identity Verification (SIR) exercise. In a strongly worded statement, the party accused the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) of negligence and claimed he has “blood on his hands.” The allegations have triggered intense political debate in the state, with opposition parties, civil society, and election observers closely watching the unfolding developments.

Background: What Led to the Controversy?

The controversy stems from the ECI’s decision to enforce a Statewide Identity Verification (SIR) measure in West Bengal. The initiative, introduced ahead of major electoral exercises, aimed to cross-verify voter identities, update electoral rolls, and remove duplicate entries. However, the process quickly became contentious, with several political parties accusing the commission of speed, pressure, and lack of preparedness.

Reports from various districts in West Bengal suggested that local residents, particularly senior citizens and economically vulnerable groups, faced difficulties during the verification process. Long queues, extended waiting periods, and concerns over documentation reportedly led to distress. It is in this context that TMC claims 40 deaths have occurred—either due to stress-related incidents or during crowd-related disturbances.

TMC’s Sharp Allegation: ‘CEC Has Blood on His Hands’

TMC leaders, led by senior functionaries and district-level representatives, held a press conference accusing the Election Commission of gross mismanagement. Their central allegation: the stress and chaos caused by the SIR process directly resulted in 40 deaths across the state.

The party claimed that the verification process was rushed, poorly communicated, and implemented without sensitivity toward local conditions. TMC argued that elderly voters shouldn’t have been compelled to stand in long queues for hours, especially in areas where medical facilities and transport access are limited.

A TMC spokesperson said that the CEC must take moral responsibility and alleged that the commission “has blood on its hands.” According to the party, the Election Commission “failed to foresee the consequences” of a statewide verification drive conducted at such a scale without necessary infrastructure.

Election Commission’s Response

The Election Commission has so far rejected the TMC’s allegations, calling them politically motivated and factually unfounded. Officials stated that the SIR process is legally mandated and is carried out periodically across states. They emphasized that the verification procedure is crucial to maintaining accurate electoral rolls and eliminating bogus voting.

The commission’s representatives also said they have not received “any official reports” confirming deaths caused by the verification process. They urged political parties to avoid “spreading misinformation” and assured that the process is being monitored closely at all administrative levels.

Opposition Reaction: A Divided Political Landscape

While TMC has launched a verbal offensive against the Election Commission, reactions from other political parties have been mixed. Opposition parties like the BJP accused TMC of “manufacturing data” and “using tragedy for political gains.” They argued that the SIR drive is essential for free and fair elections, alleging that the TMC fears losing control over voter manipulation.

Left parties, however, took a more nuanced approach. They acknowledged that reports of distress during the verification process must be examined, particularly concerning elderly citizens. However, they also criticized TMC for what they described as “sensationalism” without presenting verifiable evidence.

Voices From the Ground

Local reports from various districts—including North 24 Parganas, Malda, Murshidabad, and Birbhum—indicate that residents did face difficulties during identity verification. Some were unable to access necessary documents on time; others struggled with mobility issues.

Families of a few deceased individuals, reported in regional media, claimed that the verification process caused extreme stress or sudden health complications. While these accounts fuel public debate, independent verification is yet to be conducted on a large scale. Civil society groups have requested a comprehensive inquiry.

Demand for Inquiry and Accountability

TMC has demanded a judicial inquiry into the alleged deaths. They have also insisted that the Chief Election Commissioner personally visit the affected districts to assess the situation. The party claims that the ECI’s “bureaucratic indifference” has contributed to both tragedy and public fear.

Human rights groups have joined the demand for an investigation, stating that any exercise conducted on such a massive scale must prioritize public safety.

The Bigger Picture: Elections and Accountability

The controversy underscores the tension between administrative necessity and humanitarian considerations during large-scale electoral exercises. India, with its vast population, regularly undertakes voter roll updates, but the West Bengal case highlights challenges faced by the elderly, rural communities, and marginalised citizens.

As the state prepares for upcoming elections, political parties are expected to amplify the issue. For the TMC, the allegation against the CEC reinforces their narrative of federal overreach and “targeted pressure.” For opposition parties, it represents an opportunity to challenge TMC’s governance claims.

Conclusion

The TMC’s allegation that the CEC has “blood on his hands” marks one of the most intense confrontations between a state government and the Election Commission in recent years. With claims of 40 SIR-related deaths, the issue has become a flashpoint in West Bengal politics, prompting demands for accountability, transparency, and inquiry. As debates escalate, all eyes remain on how the Election Commission addresses the concerns and whether an independent investigation will shed light on the truth behind the tragic claims.

Do Follow Us Instagram

Related Articles

Leave a Reply