By Union Home Minister Amit Shah has officially responded to a letter sent by CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas, marking a notable exchange between the two leaders. What caught public attention was that Brittas’ letter was written completely in Malayalam, urging the Home Minister to address issues pertinent to Kerala. Shah’s response, acknowledging the concerns and addressing them in detail, has sparked discussions on linguistic inclusivity, federal responsibility, and the political dynamics between the Centre and the Left.
Background: A Letter That Triggered a National Conversation
CPI(M) MP John Brittas wrote to the Union Home Minister earlier this month highlighting several issues ranging from administrative concerns to matters involving Kerala’s law and order and Centre–State relations. The fact that the letter was written entirely in Malayalam was symbolic—Brittas has long advocated for the use of Indian languages in official communication, particularly when representing regional concerns.
The letter addressed subjects such as:
- Centre’s alleged delay in providing approvals for State projects
- Issues related to cooperative sector investigations
- Concerns regarding federal policies affecting Kerala
- Requests for intervention on pending administrative matters
The communication became widely discussed on social media, with supporters praising Brittas for using his regional language in Parliament correspondence.
Shah’s Response Marks a Strong Administrative Stand
Home Minister Amit Shah issued a formal response addressing each issue raised by Brittas. His reply emphasized that:
- The Union Government remains committed to cooperative federalism
- All states are treated equally regardless of political differences
- Investigations and administrative decisions follow legal procedures, not political motivations
Shah reiterated that the Centre is “fully committed to the development and welfare of people in all states,” and clarified the status of certain pending matters mentioned in the MP’s letter.
Significance of Responding to a Letter in a Regional Language
One of the most notable aspects of the exchange was the language factor. The Home Minister acknowledged receiving the Malayalam letter and ensured that it was examined and processed with full seriousness.
This reflects the Centre’s sensitivity toward linguistic diversity, particularly at a time when debates over the place of regional languages in governance are gaining momentum. The incident also highlighted that:
- Parliament members are free to communicate in any Scheduled Indian language
- Ministries must handle multilingual communication responsibly
- Regional languages can coexist with national administrative frameworks
Many political analysts termed it a “healthy democratic gesture” that strengthens linguistic confidence among smaller states.
Political Reactions from Kerala and Beyond
The exchange quickly became a talking point in Kerala’s political circles. CPI(M) leaders appreciated Brittas for raising state-specific issues forcefully, while BJP leaders interpreted Shah’s reply as evidence of the Centre’s transparency and willingness to engage.
Reactions from CPI(M)
The Left party stated that the Home Minister’s response validates the importance of addressing Kerala’s concerns. They also reiterated their stance that the State has faced discrimination in the allocation of central funds and approvals.
Reactions from BJP
The BJP criticized CPI(M)’s narrative, arguing that the Centre has always supported Kerala and that the Home Minister’s reply “exposes the misinformation spread by the Left.” BJP leaders also claimed that the Centre has provided significant disaster relief and developmental support to the State in recent years.
Public Perception
Among the general public, the focus was more on the language aspect, with Kerala residents appreciating that Malayalam was used effectively in national communication.
Centre–State Issues Discussed in the Letters
While the specifics of both letters were not fully disclosed publicly, sources from both sides indicated that the correspondence involved issues such as:
1. Pending Infrastructure and Administrative Approvals
Brittas reportedly raised concerns over delays in central clearances for Kerala’s major infrastructure projects.
2. Investigations into Cooperative Sector Institutions
He expressed objection to what he termed as “targeted central investigations,” while Shah clarified that agencies operate under statutory mandates.
3. Financial Relations and Grants
Concerns over reduced central funds were highlighted, to which the Home Minister responded with data disputing the claims.
4. Federal Structure Issues
Brittas argued that the Centre should avoid overreach into subjects constitutionally assigned to states.
Strengthening Democratic Dialogue
The exchange between Shah and Brittas has been widely viewed as a positive example of democratic engagement, especially across political rivals. It demonstrates that:
- Constructive communication remains possible despite ideological differences
- Regional issues deserve attention at the highest levels
- Dialogue in regional languages is not only acceptable but welcomed
Political experts believe this exchange sets a precedent for more inclusive communication channels between MPs and Union ministries.
Conclusion: A Rare, Symbolic, and Impactful Exchange
The correspondence between Union Home Minister Amit Shah and CPI(M) leader John Brittas stands out for both its political and cultural significance. Beyond the administrative clarifications provided by Shah, the exchange highlighted the importance of linguistic diversity, strengthened democratic dialogue, and brought Kerala’s concerns into national focus.
In a time where political polarization often overshadows communication, this exchange serves as a reminder that meaningful dialogue—regardless of the language used—remains crucial for India’s democratic and federal framework.
Do Follow Us Instagram
